Matchett, E.L., and Fleskes, J.P., 2018, Recent historical and projected (years 2006–99) areas (km2) of managed, flooded habitats used by waterbirds overwintering in Central Valley, California basins for 17 climate, urbanization, and water management scenarios: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7NV9GDQ.
Summary
The dataset accompanies Figures 2–4 of Matchett and Fleskes (2018) and therein the subject data are referenced as "Table A1". Data summarize peak abundance (km2) of Central Valley waterbird habitats (i.e., wetland and flooded cropland types) that are available between August and April (of the following year) for each of 17 projected scenarios by planning basin, scenario, and habitat. Area of each habitat for each scenario-basin combination is provided for the month when the most area of the respective habitat is typically flooded and available for waterbird use (i.e., January for all wetlands and winter-flooded rice and corn, and September for other winter-flooded crops in Tulare Basin). The dataset also includes relatively recent [...]
Summary
The dataset accompanies Figures 2–4 of Matchett and Fleskes (2018) and therein the subject data are referenced as "Table A1". Data summarize peak abundance (km2) of Central Valley waterbird habitats (i.e., wetland and flooded cropland types) that are available between August and April (of the following year) for each of 17 projected scenarios by planning basin, scenario, and habitat. Area of each habitat for each scenario-basin combination is provided for the month when the most area of the respective habitat is typically flooded and available for waterbird use (i.e., January for all wetlands and winter-flooded rice and corn, and September for other winter-flooded crops in Tulare Basin). The dataset also includes relatively recent (year 2005) area of habitat (i.e., “existing_km2”) for comparison with habitat areas based on scenarios. Flooded cropland habitats are defined as winter-flooded rice, winter-flooded corn, and other winter-flooded cropland (in Tulare basin). Wetlands are defined as summer-irrigated seasonal wetland, seasonal wetland that is not summer irrigated, and semipermanent wetland (combines semipermanent and permanent wetland types). This dataset includes results for eight of nine basins defined by the Central Valley Joint Venture in the Central Valley Joint Venture Implementation Plan (2006); subject basins are the Colusa, Butte, Sutter, American, Yolo, Delta, San Joaquin, and Tulare Basins (Suisun Basin excluded). Data on availability of waterbird habitats is summarized by planning basin, scenario, habitat, and month in 5 metrics (in addition to recent historical area): the least available area; areas available in ≥ 25%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 75% of years; and maximum available area.
These data support the following publication: Matchett EL, Fleskes JP. 2018. Waterbird habitat in California’s Central Valley basins under climate, urbanization, and water management scenarios. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. Online early. doi:10.3996/122016-JFWM-095
Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.
Metadata for Table A1.xml Original FGDC Metadata
View
39.22 KB
application/fgdc+xml
Dataset_figs2_4_peak habitat areas by scenario, basin.csv
66.53 KB
text/csv
Purpose
Project research was funded to evaluate potential future impacts of changes in climate, urbanization, and water supply management on waterbird habitats. These data provide results information that is referenced in a corresponding scientific article composed for publication (in review). References to the data currently pertain to waterbirds, but may be applied to other species that depend on some or all of the same habitats as waterbirds. We anticipate that this data will be used in the future to evaluate potential scenario and habitat impacts on waterbird biology, namely through the use of avian bioenergetics models.
Rights
The authors of these data require that data users contact them regarding intended use and to assist with understanding limitations and interpretation. Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
