Filters: partyWithName: Renee McPherson (X)

Folders: ROOT > ScienceBase Catalog > National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers > North Central CASC ( Show direct descendants )

Location Folder Show Tree ROOT _ScienceBase Catalog __National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers ___North Central CASC FY 2011 Projects FY 2012 Projects FY 2013 Projects FY 2014 Projects FY 2015 Projects More... Filters Date Range Past year (0) Past month (0) Past week (0) Past day (0) Custom range... To   Search Extensions Citation (4) Types Citation (4) Contacts Aparna Bamzai Jill Lackett North Central CASC Deprecated[17292] Office of the Regional Executive, North Central Area U.S. Geological Survey More... Categories Publication (4) Tag Types Theme (1) Place (1) Harvest Set (1) Organization (1) Science Themes (1) Science Tools For Managers (1) USGS Scientific Topic Keyword (1) Tag Schemes USGS Thesaurus (1) None (1) Common Geographic Areas (1) https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/NCCWSC/Project/OrganizationName (1) https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/NCCWSC/ScienceThemes (1) https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/NCCWSC/ScienceToolsforManagers (1) View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV Browse Folder

Chapter 19: Great Plains; Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment The National Climate Assessment summarizes the impacts of climate change on the United States, now and in the future. A team of more than 300 experts guided by a 60-member Federal Advisory Committee produced the report, which was extensively reviewed by the public and experts, including federal agencies and a panel of the National Academy of Sciences. The report can be explored interactively at http://nca2014.globalchange.gov. Categories: Publication; Types: Citation; Tags: North Central CASC, Science Tools for Managers, State of the Science Summary of North Central and South Central Climate Adaptation Science Centers Project Evaluation Survey Data Collected from 2018-2019 The design of this survey protocol is based on the indicator framework presented in Wall et. al (2017 https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0008.1) and is intended to evaluate projects funded by Climate Adaptation Science Centers. All survey questions were optional to complete. The intended respondents are stakeholders who were engaged in the creation of scientific knowledge and tools during these projects. The questions cover three topical areas: process (engagement in the process of knowledge production), outputs/outcomes (use of information), and impacts (building of relationships and trust). Results of the survey are presented as summary tables in order to protect personal identifiable information of the respondents.... Tags: North Central Region, South Central Region, USGS Science Data Catalog (SDC), United States, external research support, All tags... none, project evaluation, science centers, social science, Fewer tags CASC Project Evaluation Survey Template The design of this survey protocol is based on the indicator framework presented in Wall et. al (2017 https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0008.1) and is intended to evaluate projects funded by Climate Adaptation Science Centers. The intended respondents are stakeholders who were engaged in the creation of scientific knowledge and tools during these projects. The questions cover three topical areas: process (engagement in the process of knowledge production), outputs/outcomes (use of information), and impacts (building of relationships and trust). Categories: Publication; Types: Citation When Do Climate Services Achieve Societal Impact? Evaluations of Actionable Climate Adaptation Science To cope with complex environmental impacts in a changing climate, researchers are increasingly being asked to produce science that can directly support policy and decision making. To achieve such societal impact, scientists are using climate services to engage directly with stakeholders to better understand their needs and inform knowledge production. However, the wide variety of climate-services outcomes—ranging from establishing collegial relationships with stakeholders to obtaining specific information for inclusion into a pre-existing decision process—do not directly connect to traditional methods of measuring scientific impact (e.g., publication citations, journal impact factor). In this paper, we describe... Categories: Publication; Types: Citation Engaging with stakeholders to produce actionable science: a framework and guidance Natural and cultural resource managers are increasingly working with the scientific community to create information on how best to adapt to the current and projected impacts of climate change. Engaging with these managers is a strategy that researchers can use to ensure that scientific outputs and findings are actionable (or useful and usable). In this article, the authors adapt Davidson’s wheel of participation to characterize and describe common stakeholder engagement strategies across the spectrum of Inform, Consult, Participate, and Empower. This adapted framework provides researchers with a standardized vocabulary for describing their engagement approach, guidance on how to select an approach, methods for implementing... Categories: Publication; Types: Citation