Filters: partyWithName: Ecosystems (X) > partyWithName: Rebecca M Kreiling (X)
Folders: ROOT > ScienceBase Catalog > Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC) > Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center Data > Laurentian Great Lakes ( Show all descendants )
2 results (10ms)
Location
Folder
ROOT _ScienceBase Catalog __Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC) ___Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center Data ____Laurentian Great Lakes Filters
Date Range
Contacts
Categories Tag Types Tag Schemes |
Lake Superior is historically a nutrient poor lake that does not typically support significant cyanobacterial blooms. However, the lake has been experiencing an increase in blooms in the western portion of the basin recently. The largest blooms documented have occurred after recent major flooding events, indicating that nutrients transported to the lake during these events may be a source for the blooms. This study looks into the combination of streambed sediment-derived nutrient data during base flow conditions and suspended and settled sediment-derived nutrient data from storm events to provide information about nutrient transformation and storage in the river networks of the Bois Brule River and Siskiwit River...
Categories: Data;
Tags: Aquatic Biology,
USGS Science Data Catalog (SDC),
Upper Wisconsin,
Water Quality,
Western Lake Superior,
Nutrient reduction on the landscape scale often focuses on actions that reduce the movement of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from agricultural lands into streams and rivers. However, processing of N and P in streams and rivers can be substantial and increasing these in-stream processing rates could result in reductions or transformations of nutrients to less labile or less mobile forms. We hypothesize that buffer conditions could influence the microbial community and sediment characteristics of streams and rivers and thereby influence in-stream N and P processing rates. As a result, we predict that variation in buffer land cover (from agricultural to wetlands to forest) causes differences in processing rates....
|
![]() |