Folders: ROOT > ScienceBase Catalog > National Fish Habitat Partnership > National Fish Habitat Partnership Data System > NFHP Data Catalog > Data Products from Fish Habitat Partnerships > Western Native Trout Initiative ( Show all descendants )
4 results (8ms)
Location
Folder
ROOT _ScienceBase Catalog __National Fish Habitat Partnership ___National Fish Habitat Partnership Data System ____NFHP Data Catalog _____Data Products from Fish Habitat Partnerships ______Western Native Trout Initiative Filters
Date Range
Extensions Types
Contacts
Categories Tag Types
|
This shapefile is the official boundary of the Western Native Trout Initiative. The boundary was originally developed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and was updated in 2013 to reflect revisions from the Western Native Trout Initiative, a recognized Fish Habitat Partnership (FHP) of the National Fish Habitat Partnership.
Categories: Data;
Types: ArcGIS REST Map Service,
ArcGIS Service Definition,
Downloadable,
Map Service;
Tags: Alaska,
Analytical boundary,
Aquatic habitats,
Arizona,
Boundaries,
A storymap that allows users to learn about the Western Native Trout Initiative and explore stories of five native trout and their triumphs of restoration, collaboration, conservation, education, and protection.
This conservation assessment of the U.S. Rio Grande Watershed identifies target areas for the implementation of habitat-related projects and priority areas, stream segments, and watersheds to improve ecological condition, restore natural processes, and prevent the decline of intact and healthy systems. Through systematic conservation planning, this assessment addresses multi-species and multi-jurisdictional concerns; work that complements and extends analogous conservation assessments completed for much of the Desert Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s (DLCC) extent. In doing so, it provides a flexible working model into which priority taxa and habitats can be easily incorporated in the future.
Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin have one of the highest levels of endemism in the United States. The range and abundance of these fish has declined over the last century and continues to decline as a result of legacy impacts from past management practices, current water management, interactions with non-natives, and other impacts. Seven of these fish are considered imperiled by the American Fisheries Society and four are listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. We applied a complementarity-based approach to develop priority ranks (0 – 1; low to high) for catchments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We used methods and a framework that we had previously developed for the Lower Colorado...
|
|