Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Folders: ROOT > ScienceBase Catalog > National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers > Northeast CASC > FY 2017 Projects > “Hyperscale” Modeling to Understand and Predict Temperature Changes in Midwest Lakes > Approved DataSets > Process-guided deep learning predictions of lake water temperature > Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5 Model prediction data ( Show all descendants )

3 results (9ms)   

Location

Folder
ROOT
_ScienceBase Catalog
__National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers
___Northeast CASC
____FY 2017 Projects
_____“Hyperscale” Modeling to Understand and Predict Temperature Changes in Midwest Lakes
______Approved DataSets
_______Process-guided deep learning predictions of lake water temperature
________Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5 Model prediction data
Filters
Date Range
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Multiple modeling frameworks were used to predict daily temperatures at 0.5m depth intervals for a set of diverse lakes in the U.S. states of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Process-Based (PB) models were configured and calibrated with training data to reduce root-mean squared error. Uncalibrated models used default configurations (PB0; see Winslow et al. 2016 for details) and no parameters were adjusted according to model fit with observations. Deep Learning (DL) models were Long Short-Term Memory artificial recurrent neural network models which used training data to adjust model structure and weights for temperature predictions (Jia et al. 2019). Process-Guided Deep Learning (PGDL) models were DL models with an added...
thumbnail
Multiple modeling frameworks were used to predict daily temperatures at 0.5m depth intervals for a set of diverse lakes in the U.S. states of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Process-Based (PB) models were configured and calibrated with training data to reduce root-mean squared error. Uncalibrated models used default configurations (PB0; see Winslow et al. 2016 for details) and no parameters were adjusted according to model fit with observations. Deep Learning (DL) models were Long Short-Term Memory artificial recurrent neural network models which used training data to adjust model structure and weights for temperature predictions (Jia et al. 2019). Process-Guided Deep Learning (PGDL) models were DL models with an added...
thumbnail
Multiple modeling frameworks were used to predict daily temperatures at 0.5m depth intervals for a set of diverse lakes in the U.S. states of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Process-Based (PB) models were configured and calibrated with training data to reduce root-mean squared error. Uncalibrated models used default configurations (PB0; see Winslow et al. 2016 for details) and no parameters were adjusted according to model fit with observations. Deep Learning (DL) models were Long Short-Term Memory artificial recurrent neural network models which used training data to adjust model structure and weights for temperature predictions (Jia et al. 2019). Process-Guided Deep Learning (PGDL) models were DL models with an added...


    map background search result map search result map Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5c All lakes historical prediction data Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5a Lake Mendota detailed prediction data Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5b Sparkling Lake detailed prediction data Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5b Sparkling Lake detailed prediction data Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5a Lake Mendota detailed prediction data Process-guided deep learning water temperature predictions: 5c All lakes historical prediction data