Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) lage ex steud
Citation
Michael F Allen, Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) lage ex steud: .
Summary
Root growth characteristics and water transport were compared between non-mycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis infected with Glomus fasciculatus. Mycorrhizal plants did not have significantly different leaf area or root length from non-mycorrhizal plants, but did have significantly fewer and shorter root hairs. Mycorrhizal plants had 50% lower leaf resistance with no change in leaf or root water potentials; thus transpiration was increased 100% with a 50% reduction in whole-plant, soil-to-root and root-to-leaf resistance. Assuming that the difference in water uptake was due to transport via the mycorrhizal hyphae, estimated fungus-to-root transport was 2.8 × 10−5 mg s−1 per hyphal [...]
Summary
Root growth characteristics and water transport were compared between non-mycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis infected with Glomus fasciculatus. Mycorrhizal plants did not have significantly different leaf area or root length from non-mycorrhizal plants, but did have significantly fewer and shorter root hairs. Mycorrhizal plants had 50% lower leaf resistance with no change in leaf or root water potentials; thus transpiration was increased 100% with a 50% reduction in whole-plant, soil-to-root and root-to-leaf resistance. Assuming that the difference in water uptake was due to transport via the mycorrhizal hyphae, estimated fungus-to-root transport was 2.8 × 10−5 mg s−1 per hyphal entry point which compares favourably with evapotranspiration rates measured in other coenocytic fungi. Thus, one of the major factors causing increased water transport and reduced resistance to water through-flow with mycorrhizal infection may be the increased surface area provided by the hyphae.
Published in New Phytologist, volume 91, issue 2, on pages 191 - 196, in 1982.
