Mortality rates of early developmental stages of freshwater drum and sunfish in the Upper Mississippi River System
Dates
Publication Date
1993-12
Summary
Larval fish were sampled with plankton nets at two backwater and two main channel stations in Pool 8 in 1990, and at one main channel and one backwater station in Pools 8 and 14 in 1989 (four stations each year). Growth of sunfish (Lepomis spp.) and freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens) was estimated with a length-based method and an otolith-based method. For each method, instantaneous mortality was estimated by regressing the natural logarithm of fish catch for each 1-mm size group against the group's estimated age. For freshwater drum, length-based and otolith-based estimates of mortality were similar at three of four main channel stations. However, for larval sunfish, the otolith-based method provided more precise estimates of [...]
Summary
Larval fish were sampled with plankton nets at two backwater and
two main channel stations in Pool 8 in 1990, and at one main
channel and one backwater station in Pools 8 and 14 in 1989 (four
stations each year). Growth of sunfish (Lepomis spp.) and
freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens) was estimated with a
length-based method and an otolith-based method. For each method,
instantaneous mortality was estimated by regressing the natural
logarithm of fish catch for each 1-mm size group against the
group's estimated age. For freshwater drum, length-based and
otolith-based estimates of mortality were similar at three of four
main channel stations. However, for larval sunfish, the
otolith-based method provided more precise estimates of growth
than the length-based method at two of three stations. Estimates
of mortality were similar for both methods in Pool 14, where
catches were higher, but the length-based method gave
significantly higher estimates in Pool 8, where the catches were
lower. Both length-based and otolith-based methods can
effectively estimate larval fish growth and mortality, but each
may be more appropriate for certain situations. Length-based
methods require large catches to produce reliable estimates, but
are less labor intensive than the otolith-based method.
Contract report by the National
Biological Survey, National Fisheries Research Center, La Crosse,
Wisconsin, for the National Biological Survey, Environmental
Management Technical Center, Onalaska, Wisconsin