Skip to main content

National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data for Alaska linked to HUC12s for Alaska: ESRI Service Definition

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
2000
End Date
2007

Summary

This service definition contains landscape factors representing potential human disturbances to river systems summarized in 12-digit USGS hydrological units (HUC12s) for the state of Alaska. Variables include land uses, barriers to fish movement, landing strips/airports, mines, point-source pollutant sites, and infrastructure like pipelines, railroads, and roads. The source datasets that were compiled and attributed to HUC12s were identified as being: (1) meaningful for assessing fish habitat; (2) consistent across the entire state of Alaska in the way that they were assembled; (3) representative of conditions from 2000 to 2010; and (4) of sufficient spatial resolution that they could be used to make valid comparisons among HUC-12s. [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Extension: ESRI Service Definition.zip
thumbnail.png thumbnail 9.46 KB

Purpose

These data were collected for multiple purposes. First, they were gathered in support of conducting a condition assessment of fluvial waterbodies throughout Alaska in support of the National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP). Second, these data were intended to be made available to NFHAP Partnerships as well as other users interested in acquiring consistently-organized information for characterizing condition of and potential disturbances to river systems over larger regions. This work was supported by local, state, and federal partners of NFHAP, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Geological Survey. Because the condition assessment was conducted over such a large geographic region, we adopted a landscape approach for assessment which assumed that anthropogenic disturbances as well as natural characteristics in watersheds affect a given unit of fluvial habitat which in turn could affect fishes. It was necessary to use a landscape approach because landscape data are available for every location in Alaska whereas local measures of habitat or biological indicators of habitat condition were only available in a consistent and usable format at a very small percentage of locations throughout the state at the time of this assessment.

Additional Information

ArcGIS Service Definition Extension

boundingBox
minY52.7571089135557
minX-173.130096109499
maxY71.3393827662409
maxX-129.992262662006
enabledServices
KmlServer
WMSServer
filePathUsed__disk__e2/e5/52/e2e55253383417a1093fd75c92a171823f01494a
files
namenfhap_hci_alaska.sd
titleESRI Service Definition
contentTypex-gis/x-arcgis-service-def
pathOnDisk__disk__e2/e5/52/e2e55253383417a1093fd75c92a171823f01494a
dateUploadedWed Jun 10 16:58:05 MDT 2015
originalMetadatatrue
namethumbnail.png
contentTypeimage/png
pathOnDisk__disk__95/4a/7b/954a7b6e0f640fe7a15a2441b0c74bc0bbe1e8a9
imageWidth200
imageHeight133
dateUploadedWed Jun 10 16:59:45 MDT 2015
nameESRI Service Definition
processingStatesuccess
serviceId5578c161e4b032353cc17264
servicePath5578c161e4b032353cc17264

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...