Temperature regimes and turbulent heat fluxes across a heterogeneous canopy in an Alaskan boreal forest
Dates
Year
2015
Citation
Starkenburg, Derek, Fochesatto, Gilberto J., Cristobal, Jordi, Prakash, Anupma, Gens, Rudiger, Alfieri, Joseph G., Nagano, Hirohiko, Harazono, Yoshinobu, Iwata, Hiroki, and Kane, Douglas L., 2015, Temperature regimes and turbulent heat fluxes across a heterogeneous canopy in an Alaskan boreal forest: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, v. 120, no. 4, p. 1348-1360.
Summary
We evaluate local differences in thermal regimes and turbulent heat fluxes across the heterogeneous canopy of a black spruce boreal forest on discontinuous permafrost in interior Alaska. The data were taken during an intensive observing period in the summer of 2013 from two micrometeorological towers 600 m apart in a central section of boreal forest, one in a denser canopy (DC) and the other in a sparser canopy, but under approximately similar atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow conditions. Results suggest that on average 34% of the half-hourly periods in a day are nonstationary, primarily during night and during ABL transitions. Also, thermal regimes differ between the two towers; specifically between midnight and 0500 Alaska [...]
Summary
We evaluate local differences in thermal regimes and turbulent heat fluxes across the heterogeneous canopy of a black spruce boreal forest on discontinuous permafrost in interior Alaska. The data were taken during an intensive observing period in the summer of 2013 from two micrometeorological towers 600 m apart in a central section of boreal forest, one in a denser canopy (DC) and the other in a sparser canopy, but under approximately similar atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow conditions. Results suggest that on average 34% of the half-hourly periods in a day are nonstationary, primarily during night and during ABL transitions. Also, thermal regimes differ between the two towers; specifically between midnight and 0500 Alaska Standard Time (AKST) it is about 3°C warmer at DC. On average, the sensible heat flux at DC was greater. For midday periods, the difference between those fluxes exceeded 30% of the measured flux and over 30 W m−2 in magnitude more than 60% of the time. These differences are due to higher mechanical mixing as a result of the increased density of roughness elements at DC. Finally, the vertical distribution of turbulent heat fluxes verifies a maximum atop the canopy crown (2.6 h) when compared with the subcanopy (0.6 h) and above canopy (5.1 h), where h is the mean canopy height. We argue that these spatial and vertical variations of sensible heat fluxes result from the complex scale aggregation of energy fluxes over a heterogeneous canopy.
