Skip to main content

Electrical Resistivity Tomography Inverted Models

Electrical Resistivity Tomography Data at Fort Irwin National Training Center, San Bernardino County, California, 2015 and 2017

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
2015-10-29
End Date
2017-04-23

Citation

Thayer, D.C., Ball, L.B., Densmore, J.N., Swarzenski, P.W., and Johnson, C., 2018, Electrical Resistivity Tomography Data at Fort Irwin National Training Center, San Bernardino County, California, 2015 and 2017: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F77W6BF0.

Summary

The U.S. Army Fort Irwin National Training Center (NTC), approximately 35 mi north-northeast of Barstow, California, covers approximately 1,177 square miles, and is comprised of ten groundwater basins, three of which have been subdivided into subbasins on the basis of additional hydrologic testing. Since the early 1990s, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has been studying water resources issues at Fort Irwin. One issue of concern is the potential effect of groundwater development resulting from planned training expansion and infrastructure at the NTC on natural springs and seeps, an important water source for wildlife. In 2010, the USGS entered into cooperative agreements with the U.S. Army to complete studies of groundwater resources [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

BS1_dd_56elec_2015.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bitter Spring, 2015”
79.73 KB text/plain
BS1_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bitter Spring, 2017”
62.4 KB text/plain
BS2_dd_56elec_2015.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bitter Spring, 2015”
79.68 KB text/plain
BS2_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bitter Spring, 2017”
79.68 KB text/plain
GS_dd_35elec_2015.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Garlic Spring, 2015”
31.24 KB text/plain
GS_dd_35elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Garlic Spring, 2017”
30.9 KB text/plain
GS_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Garlic Spring, 2017”
78.69 KB text/plain
JS1_dd_56elec_2015.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Jack Spring, 2015”
60.04 KB text/plain
JS1_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Jack Spring, 2017”
60.04 KB text/plain
JS2_dd_56elec_2015.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Jack Spring, 2015”
63.59 KB text/plain
JS2_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Jack Spring, 2017”
63.59 KB text/plain
JS2C_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Jack Spring, 2017”
63.02 KB text/plain
PH_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bicycle Lake Basin, 2017”
79.56 KB text/plain
FZ_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bicycle Lake Basin, 2017”
79.64 KB text/plain
GDC_dd_56elec_2017.dat
“Inverted resistivity model, Bicycle Lake Basin, 2017”
79.75 KB text/plain
ERT_model_dictionary.csv
“ERT model dictionary”
123 Bytes text/csv

Purpose

Data were collected for two purposes: (1) to quantify the spatial extent of groundwater at three groups of natural springs, and to detect hydrologic change in spring characteristics between 2015 and 2017, and (2) to investigate the subsurface structure associated with ground failures on the surface of a dry lakebed.

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...