Skip to main content

Estimating the presence of paved surface parking lots in the conterminous U.S. from land-use coefficients for 1974, 1982, 1992, 2002, and 2012

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
1974-01-01
End Date
2012-12-31

Citation

Falcone, J.A., and Nott, M.A., 2019, Estimating the presence of paved surface parking lots in the conterminous U.S. from land-use coefficients for 1974, 1982, 1992, 2002, and 2012: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9UTMB64.

Summary

Parking lots may be a significant source of pollution. Oil, sediments, and heavy metals may accumulate on their surface, then be flushed into rivers, streams, and lakes via rainfall. At present no dataset provides a mapping or estimation of parking lot area or locations nationwide. This product consists of a time series of five national 60-meter raster datasets which estimate the proportion of each pixel represented by parking lots, based on land-use coefficients. The rasters span the conterminous United States, for the years 1974, 1982, 1992, 2002, and 2012. The dataset was derived by calculating coefficients for 18 land-use types (Commercial, Industrial, Residential, Recreation, and so on) from the 2012 U.S. Geological Survey NAWQA [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

training-and-overall-validation-mar27-2019.xlsx 161.9 KB application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
county-stats-1974-2012-mar27-2019.xlsx 268.28 KB application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
validation-indiv-cities-mar27-2019.xlsx 24.49 KB application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
parking_2012_tif.zip 352.78 MB application/zip
parking_2002_tif.zip 350.77 MB application/zip
parking_1992_tif.zip 349.61 MB application/zip
parking_1982_tif.zip 348.58 MB application/zip
parking_1974_tif.zip 345.5 MB application/zip

Purpose

The data are intended for GIS-based area calculations, for example calculating mean values for watersheds or regions. They are not well-suited for very small areas. Of the six validation areas tested, the accuracy for the smallest one, which had an area of 14 square kilometers (sq km), was poor. However, for the other five validation areas, which all had areas greater than 80 sq km, the accuracy was much better (see Attribute Accuracy Report section below).

Map

Communities

  • USGS Data Release Products

Tags

Provenance

Additional Information

Identifiers

Type Scheme Key
DOI https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/item/identifier doi:10.5066/P9UTMB64

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...