Investigation of Scale-dependent Groundwater/Surface-water Exchange in Rivers by Gradient Self-Potential Logging: Numerical Model and Field Experiment Data, Quashnet River, Massachusetts, October 2017 (ver. 2.0, November 2020)
Dates
Publication Date
2020-02-04
Start Date
2017-10-11
End Date
2019-09-30
Last Revision
2020-11-06
Citation
Ikard, S.J., Briggs, M.A., Minsley, B.J., and Lane, J.W., 2020, Waterborne self-potential logging data for remote detection of groundwater and surface water exchanges: Laboratory experiments and field experiments in the Quashnet River, Massachusetts, October 2017 - September, 2019 (ver. 2.0, November 2020): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9FFPATU.
Summary
This data release contains waterborne self-potential (SP) logging data measured during 48 laboratory experiments and three field experiments that were performed to develop an efficient, accurate method for detecting (in the laboratory) and geolocating (in the field) focused vertical groundwater discharge (surface-water gains) and recharge (surface-water losses) in a river. The experimental procedures and results are described and interpreted in a companion journal article titled "Remote detection of focused groundwater/surface-water exchange in rivers using waterborne self-potential logging: Laboratory and field experiments," and are similar to waterborne SP logging data measured, modeled, and interpreted by Ikard et al. (2017, 2018). [...]
Summary
This data release contains waterborne self-potential (SP) logging data measured during 48 laboratory experiments and three field experiments that were performed to develop an efficient, accurate method for detecting (in the laboratory) and geolocating (in the field) focused vertical groundwater discharge (surface-water gains) and recharge (surface-water losses) in a river. The experimental procedures and results are described and interpreted in a companion journal article titled "Remote detection of focused groundwater/surface-water exchange in rivers using waterborne self-potential logging: Laboratory and field experiments," and are similar to waterborne SP logging data measured, modeled, and interpreted by Ikard et al. (2017, 2018). The laboratory experiments were performed at the U.S. Geological Survey Texas Water Science Center, Austin, Texas in August - September, 2019. Controlled falling-head hydraulic experiments were performed to observe the polarities, transient rates-of-change, and peak amplitudes of streaming-potential voltages attributed to quasi-steady state vertical fluxes of groundwater through submerged coarse-grained and fine-grained sand aquifers of about 0.3 m in diameter. The laboratory experiments were substantiated with two three-dimensional finite-element numerical models representing the streaming-potential fields generated during surface-water gain and surface-water loss experiments. The field experiments were performed in the Quashnet River, Cape Cod, Massachusetts on October 11, 2017, along a 1.5 kilometer reach of the river where focused, meter-scale submerged groundwater discharges occur at discrete locations within otherwise more diffuse groundwater upwelling conditions into the river (Briggs et al., 2016a,b; Rosenberry et al., 2016).
1. Briggs, M.A., Buckley, S.F., Bagtzoglou, A.C., Werkerma, D.D. and Lane, J.W., 2016a, Actively heated high-resolution fiber-optic-distributed-temperature sensing to quantify streambed flow dynamics in zones of strong groundwater upwelling: Water Resources Research 52, 5179 – 5194.
2. Briggs, M.A., Hare, D.K., Boutt, D.F., Davenport, G. and Lane, J.W., 2016b, Thermal infrared video details multiscale groundwater discharge to surface water through macropores and peat pipes: Hydrological Processes 30, p. 2510 – 2511.
3. Ikard, S.J., Teeple, A.P., Payne, J.D., Stanton, G.P. and Banta, J.R., 2017, 14.86 km profiles of the electric and self-potential fields measured in the lower Guadalupe River Channel, Texas Interior Gulf Coastal Plain, September 2016: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7CJ8CDH.
4. Ikard, S.J., Teeple, A.P., Payne, J.D., Stanton, G.P. and Banta, J.R., 2018, New insights on scale-dependent surface and groundwater exchange from a floating self-potential dipole: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 23(2), 261–287.
5. Rosenberry, D.O., Briggs, M.A., Delin, G. and Hare, D.K. 2016a, Combined use of thermal methods and seepage meters to efficiently locate, quantify, and monitor focused groundwater discharge to a sand-bed stream: Water Resources Research 52, 4486-4503.
The purpose of this work was to use non-invasive waterborne self-potential logging measurements to develop an efficient, accurate method for detecting and geolocating focused vertical groundwater and surface-water exchanges in a river. The efficacy of waterborne self-potential logging for this purpose was demonstrated by testing three hypotheses during a series of 48 laboratory experiments and 3 field experiments: (1) under suitable conditions, locations of focused groundwater and surface-water exchange can be detected remotely by floating an electric dipole in the surface-water column above the exchange locations, thereby eliminating the necessity for physical contact between the dipole electrodes and the channel bed sediments and greatly increasing spatial coverage and the efficiency of the method; (2) the groundwater and surface-water exchange flow rates are linearly correlated with the peak amplitudes and rates-of-change of the streaming-potential voltages measured over locations of focused groundwater and surface-water exchange; and (3) the streaming-potential voltages show clear differences in polarity that are related to surface-water gains and surface-water losses.