Skip to main content

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations, age estimates, redox categories, and related data for groundwater from the Great Miami buried-valley aquifer, southwestern Ohio, 2019–20

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
1999
End Date
2020

Citation

Buszka, P.M., Mathes, N.A., and Mailot, B.E., 2023, Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations, age estimates, redox categories, and related data for groundwater from the Great Miami buried-valley aquifer, southwestern Ohio, 2019–20, 2019–20: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9J7H3LB.

Summary

This data release presents results of chemical analyses of groundwater sampled during summer and autumn of 2019 and spring of 2020 from 23 wells in the Great Miami buried-valley aquifer (GM-BVA) of southwestern Ohio. Groundwater and quality-control samples were analyzed to determine concentrations of selected per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Groundwater and related quality-control samples were collected from 22 of 23 wells and analyzed for 24 different PFAS by two different laboratories that used slightly different proprietary isotope-dilution based adaptations of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) method 537.1, referred to as method 1 and method 2. Results from PFAS analysis of groundwater samples and quality-control [...]

Child Items (8)

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Purpose

These data were collected and compiled to describe concentrations of PFAS in groundwater relative to prevailing Ohio action levels and Federal health risk-based guidances from 23 shallow wells in the Great Miami buried-valley aquifer (GM-BVA) of southwestern Ohio in the Great Miami River, Little Miami River, and Whitewater RIver Basins. To understand the comparability of PFAS analytical results generated through different adaptations of the EPA 537.1 method, groundwater samples were collected by this study and analyzed at a contract laboratory using one proprietary adaptation (method 1; Bureau Veritas, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and were collected from the same wells and analyzed at a different contract laboratory by a slightly different proprietary adaptation (method 2; SGS North America Inc., Orlando, Florida). Methods 1 and 2 had different reporting limits and detection limits for specific PFAS. Quality-control samples were collected and analyzed to evaluate reproducibility of PFAS analytical results and to understand the effect of sample preparation processes on PFAS results in groundwater samples. Prior published tritium-helium-3 and tritium-based estimates of groundwater-recharge age from water sampling of these wells in1999 and 2000 and tritium-only groundwater-age categories of samples collected from these wells in 2019 and 2020 were compiled to compare with PFAS occurrence in groundwater and the general history of synthesis, common use and potential environmental release of PFAS. Redox conditions of prior groundwater samples and samples collected by this study were computed to understand PFAS detections relative to potential redox conditions known or suspected to affect their environmental persistence. Field groundwater-quality parameters were reported to permit comparison with PFAS detections in samples collected from the same wells.

Additional Information

Identifiers

Type Scheme Key
DOI https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/item/identifier doi:10.5066/P9J7H3LB

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...