Skip to main content

The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections

Dates

Publication Date

Citation

Barsugli, Joseph J., Guentchev, Galina, Horton, Radley M., Wood, Andrew, Mearns, Linda O., Liang, Xin‐Zhong, Winkler, Julie A., Dixon, Keith, Hayhoe, Katharine, Rood, Richard B., Goddard, Lisa, Ray, Andrea, Buja, Lawrence, and Ammann, Caspar, 2013-11-12, The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, v. 94, iss. 46.

Summary

Suppose you are a city planner, regional water manager, or wildlife conservation specialist who is asked to include the potential impacts of climate variability and change in your risk management and planning efforts. What climate information would you use? The choice is often regional or local climate projections downscaled from global climate models (GCMs; also known as general circulation models) to include detail at spatial and temporal scales that align with those of the decision problem. A few years ago this information was hard to come by. Now there is Web-based access to a proliferation of high-resolution climate projections derived with differing downscaling methods.

Contacts

Attached Files

Communities

  • National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers
  • Southeast CASC

Associated Items

Tags

Provenance

Created from Item #5408e3c0e4b0621a5983c43f

Additional Information

Citation Extension

journalEos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
parts
typedoi
value10.1002/2013EO460005
typestartPage
value424
typeissn
value2324-9250
typeissue
value46
typeendPage
value425
typevolume
value94

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...