Skip to main content

Greater sage-grouse population change (percent change) in a moderate oil and gas development, high population estimate scenario, and with no effects of climate change (2006-2062)

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
2006
End Date
2062

Citation

Heinrichs, J.A., Aldridge, C., O'Donnell, M., Garman, S.L., and Homer, C., 2019, Influences of Potential Oil and Gas Development and Future Climate on Sage-Grouse Declines and Redistribution: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9GRF34E.

Summary

This data set defines boundaries of oil and gas project areas, greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) core areas, and non-core and non-project areas within the Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative (WLCI; southwestern Wyoming). Specifically , the data represents results from the manuscript “Combined influences of future oil and gas development and climate on potential Sage-grouse declines and redistribution” for medium oil and gas development, high population size, and no climate component. The oil and gas development scenario were based on an energy footprint model that simulates well, pad, and road patterns for oil and gas recovery options that vary in well types (vertical and directional) and number of wells per pad [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Shapefile: GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.zip
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.cpg 5 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.dbf 67.64 KB
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.prj 432 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.sbn 1.47 KB
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.sbx 268 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.shp 1.84 MB
GRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.shx 1.07 KB

Purpose

The simulated changes in sage-grouse populations presented here can be used to inform management by: 1) understanding the possible range of effects of oil and gas development and future climate influences on sage-grouse habitat, 2) mapping scenarios of how sagebrush vegetation and sage-grouse habitat could change under alternative scenarios, and 3) indicating the degree to which different areas of the landscape could change. These data do not represent absolute predictions, rather they should be interpreted as possible relative differences.

Additional Information

Shapefile Extension

boundingBox
minY40.53593165541111
minX-111.55604248639743
maxY43.81583511962552
maxX-105.8741531231505
files
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.cpg
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__48/1e/fa/481efa6637563d1da6fffca0c0e4afdbe2468495
imageWidth580
imageHeight435
size5
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:24 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.dbf
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__19/c7/a3/19c7a33c108d07fbd88e0e26dba3f4d9d3aca0e0
imageWidth580
imageHeight435
size69262
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:24 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.prj
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__ce/19/5b/ce195b865f06170fb99c72cd06e0dd51ac51fd18
imageWidth580
imageHeight435
size432
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:24 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.sbn
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__ce/c9/f7/cec9f73cd945373515582fce20927843151f2179
size1508
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:24 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.sbx
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__5d/2b/e1/5d2be18a9ac5ece8f992fb3120e40e0412e2017f
size268
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:24 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.shp
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__9b/2d/f7/9b2df76057a6b660e7fecf9d213bbdf88d21d4fd
size1930312
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:26 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.shx
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__17/bf/4d/17bf4d1124bd65459478b2a815cf45b41abc5f2b
size1092
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:15:24 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop.shp.xml
contentTypeapplication/fgdc+xml
pathOnDisk__disk__a6/55/19/a655195e9d1cb23231bfe8d602f066e4f0c93467
dateUploadedThu Aug 20 07:30:25 MDT 2020
originalMetadatatrue
geometryTypeMultiPolygon
nameGRSGoccupancy_MedOG_HighPop

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...